RBI Autonomy: Is the Government out to Impound its Autonomous Status?

Add Review

Register now for latest MBA Exam & Admissions Updates

Recent developments have subsided the prospects of rift between RBI and the Government. The earlier event indicating the beginning of conflict between the Apex Monetary Authority The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and the Financial Authority – Ministry of Finance-Govt of India had sparked speculations that the Governor of RBI, Mr Urjit Patel could step down as the RBI feels that Government which should not interfere in its Monetary affairs in keeping and improving the monetary position of the country to a healthy and globally competitive standard, was trying to make unnecessary intervention that may hamper its autonomous working. 

Alert! MBA Admissions 2024 Closing for Top CMAT, MAT Colleges | Apply Now 
Sparsh Greater Noida | Closing Soon | Apply Now IBA Bangalore | Closing Soon | Apply Now
JIMS Rohini Delhi | Closing Soon | Apply Now Jaipuria Noida, Lucknow | Closing Soon | Apply Now
S P Jain Global Mumbai | Closing Soon | | Apply Now MET MUMBAI | Closing Soon | Apply Now
JIMS Rohini Delhi | Closing Soon | Apply Now CIMP Patna PGDM Admission 2024 | Apply Now
SSIM Hyderabad | Closing Soon | Apply Now Mahindra University HYD | Closing Soon | Apply Now
August MAT Exam 2024 Registration Open – Apply Now

With the marathon meeting of RBI Board held on Nov 19, 2018, the Government and the RBI both decided not to follow the path of confrontation and arrive at certain decision for good of the economy and keep the confronting issues in abeyance.  


This has become a hot economic topic for Group Discussion (GD) Round as well as for Writing Ability Test (WAT) in various competitive exams. Experts have gathered the key facts on the topic and suggest to use the content carefully as per the GD or WAT requirements. 

Latest GD Topics: Read 200+ Group Discussion Topics 2024 for MBA Admissions  
India Vs Maldives: How Lakshadweep Can Become A Major Tourist Destination
One Nation One Poll’: Benefits are More for India
Viksit Bharat@2047: A Timely Program for India's Transformation
The Deepfake Dilemma: Unravelling the World of AI-Generated Content
Narayana Murthy's Call for a 70-Hour Workweek: A Debate on Pros and Cons 
Peer Pressure and Family Pressure - Can it make or break your future?
Aim for the Moon, if you miss, you may hit a Star
Foreign Universities in India: Will it raise academic standards and benefit Indian students, parents?
World War 3: Will Russia Ukraine Conflict result in Third World War?
Union Budget 2023-24: Expectations & Key Highlights
Digital Public Goods (DPG): India’s approach and opportunities for the World
Tech Layoffs: Top Tech Layoffs At Big Tech Companies In 2022
India as the world’s 5th largest economy: Set to Become 4th by 2022
Indian Digital Rupee: A landmark financial initiative?
Moonlighting in India - What, Why and Should of this HR nightmare
5G Telecom Services in India – Benefits and Impact
Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL): A convenience or a trap
National Logistics Policy: Will it Reduce Costs & Improve Competitiveness of India
Agnipath: Will it Prove a Military Transformation Scheme?
Union Budget 2022: Key Highlights; will it propel post pandemic Economic Growth?
Crypto Currency: A bright future or just a fad
Privatization of Public Sector in India: A right step or selling family silver?
Social Media: A boon or a bane for society and individuals
E-Learning: A substitute for Classroom Learning?
Farm Laws Repealed: PM MODI withdraws the three farm laws
Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC): Impact on Indian Financial System & Cryptocurrency


RBI Board Meeting Dated Nov 19, 2018

Reserve Bank of India Board held a 9 hours long meeting on November 19, 2018 to discuss various issues that created rift between the RBI and the Government of India. The issues included: Capital Requirement of RBI; Financing Norms for Small and Medium enterprises (SMEs); and to further define and modify the Rules for Weak Banks. The meeting ended calling a truce between the Government and the Reserve Bank of India with following decisions:

  1. The key issues of creating rift between the Government and RBI namely Transfer of Surplus Reserves and the Relaxed Norms for Weak Banks were referred to committees.
  2. Concessions were made on Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) of Banks. But the RBI board did not agree to bring down the capital adequacy ratio in line with bare minimum levels prescribed by Basel III norms. Simultaneously, the board has extended for one more year the process for implementation of the capital conservation buffers. According to the statement issued by RBI after the meeting, ““The Board, while deciding to retain the CRAR (capital to risk weighted asset ratio) at 9%, agreed to extend the transition period for implementing the last tranche of 0.625% under the Capital Conservation Buffer (CCB), by one year, i.e., up to March 31, 2020.”
  3. Relaxing and Easing the prompt corrective action (PCA) framework for weak banks has been referred to a committee while the government is pushing for a review to allow a few Public Sector Banks out of this framework. Under RBI’s PCA framework are 11 of the 21 PSBs. In view of the Government, these PSBs are restricting credit flow to economy, including MSMEs. The board in its meeting has advised RBI to ask the banks to recast loans upto Rs.25 crore disbursed to Micro, small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs)
  4. The issue of fixing a capital framework has been referred to the committee. The fixing of a capital framework would free up RBI’s surplus reserves for transfer to the central government. Since the government requires to meet its fiscal target of 3.3% of GDP due to low tax collections, the government is contemplating that the RBI surplus transfer will help it in bridging the gap. However RBI is of the view that the reserves are very important to protect the economy during any crisis.
  5. No Agreement was reached in regard to the liquidity shortage faced by NBFCs. However, RBI has announced to inject Rs.8000 crore liquidity through open market operations in November 22, 2018. In order to ease the liquidity crunch at Non-Banking Financial Companies, the largest PSB-State Bank of India has announced to buy loans worth Rs.45,000 crores from the NBFCs. Besides, the refinance window of National Housing Bank (NHB) has also been increased to Rs.30,000 crores.

As such, now the prospects of invoking Section 7 of RBI Act 1934 by the Government, are very dim and the Central Government and RBI relationship may not go low.



  • Reserve Bank of India, the central bank of the country is an autonomous organization responsible for all the key monetary roles like Monetary controls, money supply regulation, foreign exchange, apex lender to Government, a bankers’ bank among others. RBI was created and is governed with the RBI Act and as such is a statutory autonomous entity. 
  • However, in October 2018, the Ministry of Finance, Government of India moved to invoke Section 7 of the RBI Act. The Section 7 gives powers to the government to seek consultations with RBI. If necessary, the Government may issue certain binding orders on RBI in public interest. Despite keeping its existence in RBI Act, this section has never posed any threat to RBI Auotonomy earlier as it has never been invoked even during the times of Wars fought with Pakistan and China; during the adverse balance of payment crisis or even during the period of demonetization that happened on November 8, 2016.
  • The three letters under Section 7, that were sent by the Government of India to Reserve Bank of India for consultation included the issues like Capital Adequacy Norms for Banks governed by RBI, Liquidity Crisis, Credit to Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME), Corrective measures for weak banks among others.
  • Promptly responding to these letters of GoI, the Reserve Bank of India remained firm on its stance and did not commit for the changes as desired by the Government in its policy and action plan.
  • The series of events after this communication let the problem aggravate and it is being speculated that the autonomy of the apex Monetary Authority of India, RBI is at stake and as a result the Head of RBI – Mr Urjit Patel may step down. During all this controversy, Mr Arun Jaitley, the Finance Minister of India has asserted that the Government respects the RBI Autonomy and also feels it is necessary to maintain. Accordingly, the finance ministry has not yet given direction to the RBI to follow the instructions issued by it while invoking the Section 7 of RBI Act.

What is Section 7 of RBI Act 1934?
The Section 7 of RBI Act has three parts. The most relevant first part which has sparked the tensions between RBI and the Government, states: “The central government may from time to time give such directions to the Bank (RBI) as it may, after consultation with the governor of the bank, consider necessary in the public interest.”


The Part two of the section 7 of RBI Act says, “Subject to any such directions, the general superintendence and direction of the affairs and business of the Bank shall be entrusted to a central board of directors, which may exercise all powers and do all acts and things which may be exercised or done by the Bank.”

Group Discussion Topics & Tips: Learn the Facts

  • Group Discussion (GD) is widely used for Admissions to top MBA colleges, Job interviews, and other selection process.
  • GD Tips: Learn how to start a group discussion, take the lead, make positive impact, and score high.
  • Top 100 GD Topics: GD topics can be based on Current Affairs, Business & Economy, Social Issues, or Abstract.
  • Prepare GD with MBAUniverse.com. Read 100+ GD Topics with Answers, Solutions. New topics added every week.

Why the Need Felt by Government to Invoke Section 7?
So far the discussions and consultations between the Ministry of Finance and the Reserve Bank of India have taken place without resorting to use of Section 7. The invocation of section 7 of RBI Act is considered very important for consultations as it gives the Government the scope to issue directions as it finds fit to the Reserve Bank of India.


It is also contemplated that the government might have drawn inspiration for using the Section 7 from a recent judgment of the Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad delivered in a case filed by power producers against the RBI’s February circular that mandates early detection and time-bound resolution of stressed assets. The High Court had asked the finance ministry to have consultations with the RBI within 15 days, under Section 7 of the RBI Act 1934 to resolve the issue.


HC Asks Government Not to Issue Directives to RBI
In its order on August 28, the HC had asked the Govt to refrain from issuing any directives to RBI. The order said “The central government, however, is not expected to issue any directions, as contemplated under Section 7(1), indiscriminately or randomly. Such directions are possible when there exists sufficient material in support.” 

BBA Admissions 2024 Open | Apply Now
TAPMI Bengaluru | IPM/BBA(Hons.) | Apply Now  MET Mumbai International BBA  | Apply Now
IFMR GSB KREA University BBA | Apply Now NSB Bangalore BBA Admission | Apply Now

RBI Conveyed it Position: Differs from Govt Point of View
In its reply to the Ministry of Finance on the three letters, RBI has conveyed its position on the need to retain the “stringent” prompt corrective action (PCA) framework for stressed banks and has stated that there is no liquidity crunch. The MoF, Government of India and RBI have also differed on the issue of capital adequacy norms for banks.


The RBI has given the instructions that the banks should maintain capital-to-risky asset ratio (CRAR), including capital-conservation buffer, at 11.5% — 1 percentage point higher than Basel norms. Besides, the common equity tier (CET)-1 of banks is required to be at least 5.5% of its risk-weighted assets — again 1 percentage point higher than the global norms.


However, the ministry of Finance wants the stipulation aligned with the international practices also, so that banks can lend more and add to economic growth.


Government Not Impounding RBI Autonomy: Key Points

  • The Finance Minister Arun Jaitley has blamed the RBI for not doing enough to control “indiscriminate lending” by the public sector banks during 2008-14 period
  • This has precipitated the balance-sheet problem of both the lenders and borrowers under severe, seemingly inescapable stress
  • On October 31, 2018 Government said that it respects the autonomy of the central bank but it will “have to be guided by public interest and the requirements of the Indian economy”
  • As the Government wants to manage the fiscal situation, prop up investments & consumption in the economy, ensure that the small businesses and trade as well as people are not upset with the government in the run-up to the elections, the government can insist on high transfer from RBI’s ‘surplus’ pool
  • Former chief economic adviser Arvind Subramanian had also suggested that the central bank’s ‘excess capital’ could be redeployed to bolster the capital base of state-owned banks
  • The finance ministry has also sought changes to the “stringent” prompt corrective action (PCA) regime for stressed banks
  • The Finance Ministry has suggested that the framework of corrective action be aligned with best global practices to allow banks have room for growth

RBI Dy Governor Acharya Criticises Government Move
RBI Dy Governor has criticized the move of the Government. Finding that government is trying to sneak into the central bank’s autonomous regulatory space, the Deputy Governor of RBI, Viral Acharya has criticized the Government’s move and has warned that it could spur “potentially catastrophic” consequences.


Delivering the AD Shroff memorial lecture, Acharya said governments that did not respect their central banks' independence would sooner or later incur the wrath of financial markets. The much discussed famous speech, ‘On the Importance of Independent Regulatory Institution – The Case of the Central Bank’, by Acharya reaches a host of issues.


The content of the speech which confronts the Government on all the issues against its move to undermine the autonomy of RBI has aroused unprecedented media response. Acharya’s speech reveals that he has also spoken for the restoration of RBI autonomy and built a strong and positive case for RBI independence in three important areas — monetary policy, debt management, and exchange rate management.


Acharya has pointed out that the breaking down of the RBI autonomy is associated with the context of regulation of public sector banks, absence of rules of transfer of surpluses from the RBI to government and recommendations to bypass the RBI’s powers over payment and settlement systems.


Since RBI performs several functions as a central bank like the role of monetary authority, banker to the government, debt manager to the government, monopoly issuer of legal tender currency, the custodian of payment systems and the regulator of banks, all these functions are critical for growth, macroeconomic stability and financial stability.


Acharya has pointed out that RBI faces constraints in the regulatory framework as well as in implementation of the regulatory decisions in the regulation of banks, particularly public sector banks. These limitations are related to asset divestiture, replacement of management and boards, licence revocation and resolution actions such as merger or sales.


In another speech, on October 12, titled ‘Prompt Corrective Action: An Essential Element of Financial Stability Framework’ Acharya warned the Government against on diluting the risk threshold set out by the RBI in various indicators.


While the RBI has insisted on Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) as a regulatory framework to ensure a healthy banking system for long-term growth, macroeconomic stability and financial stability, the Government, if it does not respect central bank independence will sooner or later incur wrath of financial markets, ignite economic fire and come to rue the day they undermine the regulatory institutions.


Acharya said that the government's horizon of decision-making was rendered short, like the duration of a T20 match, by several considerations.


RBI Autonomy at Stake: Experts’ Views
The autonomy of the central bank has not been debated for the first time in the Indian context. Governor after governor has raised this issue.

  • YV Reddy, former RBI Governor said, “A central bank is not expected to be subordinate to the government.” Adding further he said, “My single objective is to protect the Indian economy from the Government of India.” He also said, “The jurisdiction of the RBI over public sector banks, relative to private sector banks, has been restricted by law. The exercise of regulatory authority is constrained in practice.”
  • Raghuram Rajan has also criticized the undue interference of the Government in RBI working. He said “India needs a strong and independent RBI to ensure macroeconomic stability”.
  • Former RBI Governor D Subbarao sarcastically commenting on Government’s interference in RBI working, said, “But thank God, the Reserve Bank exists.”
  • On the move of Government to belittle the autonomy of RBI, Dr Raguram Rajan has pointed out, “The RBI Governor, as the technocrat with responsibility for the nation’s economic risk management, is not simply another bureaucrat or regulator, and efforts to belittle the position by bringing regulatory hierarchy are misguided and do not serve national interest.”
  • Experts feel that the RBI needs to maintain a strong balance sheet to perform its functions effectively. The perception that the RBI capital is in excess of what generally other central banks have is because of the amounts held in the currency and gold revaluation account (which stood at `5.29 lakh crore on June 30, 2017). The gains arising out of revaluation of foreign currency assets are notional and cannot be treated as free reserves that could be transferred to the government.
  • In view of all the experts, the Government, as a political entity, needs advice which is in the best interest of sustaining growth, maintaining macroeconomic stability and financial stability. More than 80 years of RBI history is witness to the fact that the RBI is the right organisation to advise the government in this regard. Let the government not treat the RBI as its subordinate.
  • While the RBI frames the monetary policies in the long-term interest of the nation, the government tends to believe that RBI will sing to its tunes as it has made the apex appointments in the bank
  • The Government’s priorities due to upcoming elections may change to deliver on proclaimed manifestos of the past. The Government may need deliver on populist alternatives as its manifesto could not delivered upon. But that cannot be the priority of RBI. 
  • RBI should not be directly subjected to political time-pressures and the induced neglect of the future. The government should stop using the RBI against the interests of the Nation and let RBI do its jobs as per statutes, mandates, practises 

RBI and Government Interface: Instances of Support