(Updated on March 20, 2020)
After more than 7 years of committing the heinous crime, the convicts of Nirbhaya gangrape and murder case - Akshay Thakur, Pawan Gupta, Vinay Sharma, and Mukesh Singh - were hanged at 5:30am in Tihar jail on March 20, 2020. The hanging was carried out as per the schedule after a three-judge Supreme Court bench rejected the final plea by the convicts' lawyer AP Singh to stay their execution in a late-night hearing.
After the execution of SCI order of hanging the culprits, Prime Minister Modi said, “Justice has prevailed. It is of utmost importance to ensure dignity and safety of women.”
Union Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad said, “It's a day of satisfaction that a daughter, who underwent so much pain, has got justice.”
Union minister Smriti Irani said, “Nirbhaya case convicts' hanging is a message for every criminal that one day law will catch up with you. I greet this day with aplomb that justice has finally been done to Nirbhaya.”
The four convicts in the Nirbhaya gangrape and murder case, who were hanged on Friday March 20, 2020 in morning, had not expressed any last wish. As per the law and tradition the death row convicts are asked about their last wish before hanging.
One of the convicts of the 2012 Nirbhaya gang-rape and murder case, Mukesh Singh, wished to donate his organs and had given it in writing to the authorities.
On January 7, 2020, Supreme Court issued death warrants for all the four convicts in the December 16, 2012 Nirbhaya Gang Rape and Murder Case and announced that convicts would be hanged on January 22 inside the Tihar jail. However, since then various pleas and petitions were moved in the various courts to linger on the process which took three months to execute the hanging order.
Hours after the court’s decision, Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal tweeted, “there is some sense of satisfaction after the issuance of death warrant against the convicts in the Nirbhaya case. It took seven year. This system will have to change. Such a system must be put in place which ensures that rapist are hanged within six months”.
MBA/PGDM Admissions 2022 Open | Apply Now
|LBSIM Delhi PGDM Admission 2022|
The National Commission for Women (NCW) said the verdict would act as deterrent to crime against women.
While no sane mind will like to leave the perpetrators of such heinous crime unpunished, the question remains – is death penalty the best way to punish, and deter future occurrences of such a crime. In this context, this Topic is likely to be a Hot GD Topic for MBA entrance this year. Let’s understand this topic in detail.
In recent years, the rising crime rate, particularly violent crimes against women has made the criminal sentencing by the courts a subject of concern. According to the former Chief Justice of India, Justice Dattu “The sentencing policy adopted by the Courts, in such cases, ought to have a stricter yardstick so as to act as a deterrent. There are a shockingly large number of cases where the sentence of punishment awarded to the accused is not in proportion to the gravity and magnitude of the offence thereby encouraging the criminal and in the ultimate making justice suffer by weakening the system’s credibility.”
A group from National Commission for Women also requested Capital Punishment for those who indulge in severe crimes against women.
Rising Crime Rate Against Women
- In 2016 assaults cases climbed by 60 % to around 40,000 the nation over
- 19,765 were instances of assault
- The conviction rate is dormant at around 25%
- The real frequency of assault is significantly higher as many of the case go unreported
- Authorities from NGOs working ladies share that each and every day, a young lady is being sold into substance exchange.
- Authorities from stop Acid Attacks state that there are accounts of instances of corrosive assaults in the city a few times each week.
- At regular intervals a lady is assaulted in India.
Death Penalty Justified in Severest Crimes Against Women
- Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in its judgement has noted that crime against women are on the rise and courts are too soft on the perpetrators.
- Hon’ble Court has maintained that in heinous crimes which both shock and repulse society, the extreme punishment of death is justified
- Death penalty was confirmed by the Court to two men who gang-raped and brutally murdered a 22-year-old BPO employee on November 1, 2007 night after she was picked by her company cab to the office
- In Nirbhaya Case also Death Penalty has was awarded by the Court
- In view of the Supreme Court in such “rarest of rare”, crimes, collective conscience of the community is so shocked that imposing a lesser sentence, even life imprisonment, would fail justice.
- Justice Dattu has observed “The extreme punishment of death would be justified and necessary in cases where the collective conscience of society is so shocked that it will expect the holders of judicial power to inflict death penalty irrespective of their personal opinion”. BBA Admissions Open 2021 | Apply Now!
IFIM College Bangalore BBA Admissions Open 2021 IPM/BBA/BMS Exam Join Crash Course by IMS Coaching IMS Ghaziabad (University Courses Campus) BBA Admission JAGSOM BBA Admissions Open 2021
Is Death Penalty a Solution?
Not everyone in India accepts death penalty as the only way to provide justice. Presently death penalty is given only for the "rarest of rare" cases. The interpretation of such cases is left to the court. The country's last execution was on 30 July 2015.
Lets try to understand the other point of view on this widely debated topic. Civil society members give these arguments against Capital Punishment:
- Value of human life: Human life is invaluable. Some of those against capital punishment believe that human life is so valuable that even the worst murderers should not be deprived of the value of their lives.
- Right to live: Everyone has an inalienable human right to life, even those who commit murder or rape; sentencing a person to death and executing them violates that right.
- Retribution is wrong: Many people believe that retribution is morally flawed and problematic in concept and practice.
- Failure to deter: The general consensus among social scientists is that the deterrent effect of the death penalty is at best unproven. The death penalty doesn't seem to deter people from committing serious violent crimes. The thing that deters is the likelihood of being caught and punished.
- Brutalising society: Regardless of the moral status of capital punishment, some argue that all ways of executing people cause so much suffering to the condemned person that they amount to torture and are wrong.
So, while no sane mind will like to leave the perpetrators of such heinous crime unpunished, one must debate if Capital Punishment is the best way to punish, and deter future occurrences of such a crime.
Read Latest GD Topics:
- Demonetisation: Success & failures
- Social Media: A boon or a bane for society and individuals
- Cashless Economy: Is Society ready for transformation?
- GST: Will economy grow faster with reduced rates of Goods & Services Tax?
- Walmart and Flipkart Deal: Impact on Indian Economy
- Impact of Technology on Jobs: Will Automation & Artificial Intelligence reduce or increase Jobs?
- Linking of Aadhaar: Is making Aaadhar mandatory a good idea?
- Crypto Currency: A bright future or just a fad?
- Make in India: The idea will make India a manufacturing hub
- Beti Bachao Beti Padhao: Will it abolish the orthodox mindset?